About the workshop

The State-based User Modelling Workshop at WSDM 2020 (SUM ’20) welcomes participation of researchers and stakeholders to explore techniques for state-based user modelling, and their applications, such as:

  • Conversational systems
  • User representation and recommender systems
  • Task understanding and supporting user tasks
  • Task-based information retrieval
  • State-aware evaluation
  • Human in the loop
  • User-aware systems
  • Personalisation ML algorithms
  • Cognitive/contextual user understanding
  • State-aware ML algorithms

This workshop aims at bringing together researchers from academia and industry that focus on different aspects of state-based user modelling to exchange ideas and build state-aware user-centric systems. We encourage submissions to this workshop in a variety of topics aiming to discuss the challenges associated with capturing and effectively utilising user state in different web search and data mining applications.

State-based User Modelling

Inferring and utilising user states and goals is becoming a timely challenge for successfully leveraging intelligent user-centric systems in the real-world. Examples of such systems are conversational agents, intelligent assistants, educational and contextual information retrieval systems, recommender/matchmaking systems and advertising systems, which all rely on identifying the user state, in order to provide the most relevant information to the user and assist them in achieving their goals.

For example, due to their interactive nature, search and recommender systems are notoriously hard to develop and evaluate, since they involve a multi-step decision-making process, where a stream of interactions occurs between the user and the system. Traditionally, to make the problem tractable, the interactions are often viewed as independent, but in order to improve such systems further, it becomes important to consider and leverage user states.

In the recent years, various interactive machine learning techniques (including bandit based and reinforcement learning based techniques) have been applied for interaction tasks as these approaches allow to learn and continuously change the strategy based on user feedback and other type of rewards.

Even though many such systems would significantly benefit from having a representation of the user’s state, there has been very limited work towards building intelligent learning mechanisms that can be used to identify, represent and update the state of the user.

Hence, devising information retrieval systems that can keep track of the user’s state and make recommendations based on this has been listed as one of the grand challenges of information retrieval that needs to be tackled during the next few years. In this context,we believe it is timely to organize a workshop that revisits the problem of designing and evaluating state-aware user-centric systems and makes sure the community, spanning academic and industrial backgrounds, is working on the right problem.

Goals and Objectives

This workshop aims to facilitate a forum for leveraging intelligent methods for modelling user’s state and its transition in an effective manner. Modelling user’s state is a challenging task with many currently open questions:

  • User representation and recommender systems: How to design accurate state-aware representations of the user and embed that information in predictive models?
  • Task understanding and supporting user tasks: How to identify the specific sub-task a user is trying to accomplish and design state-aware intelligent systems that assist users in each step of their goals?
  • State-aware evaluation: How to develop metrics and evaluation techniques that model and understand user states, so as to provide a more sensitive and enhanced evaluation of the user-centric systems?
  • Human in the loop: How to include the human in the learning "loop" in an interactive fashion, making feedback an integral part of the modelling?
  • User-aware systems: How to incorporate user state information in systems to achieve better human-machine intelligence?
  • Cognitive/contextual user understanding: How to understand from a cognitive point of view how actions taken by users and their context can influence their state?
  • State-aware ML algorithms: How do the different ML paradigms which enable a system to identify and leverage user states compare for different application scenarios?

To progress and answer these questions, it is imperative for research communities from cognitive science, intelligent tutoring systems, information retrieval, human computer interaction, psychology and other diverse fields to bring forward their inputs, which is one of the primary goals of this workshop.

We encourage sharing the ongoing work that is geared towards addressing these challenges, thus aiming to improve the research landscape and understanding of this emerging topic.

We aim to provide a platform for budding ideas from different fields to unite together giving inspiration to more powerful user modelling approaches. WSDM, with its attendance by a broad spectrum of cross-disciplinary researchers offers the ideal venue for this exchange of ideas. Topics of interest include areas concerning the above mentioned highlighted points.

Organizing Committee

  • Emine Yilmaz, University College London and Amazon
  • John Shawe-Taylor, University College London, UNESCO Chair in Artificial Intelligence
  • Sahan Bulathwela, University College London
  • Maria Perez-Ortiz, University College London
  • Rishabh Mehrotra, Spotify Research
  • Colin de la Higuera, Université de Nantes, UNESCO Chair in teacher training technologies with OER
  • Davor Orlic, COO, Knowledge 4 All Foundation

Important dates

  • December 1, 2019: deadline for submission of contributions to workshops
  • Final deadline extension Dec 15 
  • December 27, 2019: paper acceptance notification
  • February 7, 2020: WSDM-2020 workshops   

Programme

Location: Hyatt Regency Houston/Galleria | Room: Regency C (Level 2)

08:30 Welcome and setting the stage
  • Sahan Bulathwela, University College London
09:00‑10:00 Invited talk: Engagement, metrics and recommenders
  • Mounia Lalmas, Director of Research at Spotify
10:00‑10:30 Coffee Break
10:30‑11:00 Invited Talk: Measuring and improving user satisfaction with voice-based conversational systems
  • Eugene Agichtein, Winship Associate Professor at Emory University
11:00‑11:30 Contributed talk: Fatigue-Aware Ad Creative Selection by  Daisuke Moriwaki, Komei Fujita, Shota Yasui, and Takahiro Hoshino
11:30-12:00 Contributed talk: SAGE: Interactive State-aware Point-of-Interest Recommendation by Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani, Sruthi Viswanathan, Frederic Roulland, and Jean-Michel Renders
12:00-12:30 Contributed talk: Scalable Psychological Momentum Estimation in E-sports by Alfonso White and Daniela M. Romano
12:30-14:00 Lunch
14:00‑15:00 Invited talk: Learning from User Interactions in Productivity Applications
  • Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Principal Research Manager at Microsoft
15:00‑15:30 Coffee Break
15:30‑16:30 Invited talk: Incorporating User State in Task Based Information Retrieval and Recommendation of Educational Resources
  • Emine Yilmaz, Professor at University College London
16:30‑17:00 Closing remarks
17:00‑17:30 Optional drinks and dinner

Proceedings

Name Title and material
Sahan Bulathwela, University College London Welcome and setting the stage (slides)
Mounia Lalmas, Director of Research at Spotify Engagement, metrics and recommenders (slides)
Eugene Agichtein, Winship Associate Professor at Emory University Measuring and improving user satisfaction with voice-based conversational systems (slides)
Daisuke Moriwaki, Komei Fujita, Shota Yasui, and Takahiro Hoshino Fatigue-Aware Ad Creative Selection (slides)
Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani, Sruthi Viswanathan, Frederic Roulland, and Jean-Michel Renders SAGE: Interactive State-aware Point-of-Interest Recommendation (slides)
 Alfonso White and Daniela M. Romano Scalable Psychological Momentum Estimation in E-sports (slides)
Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Principal Research Manager at Microsoft Learning from User Interactions in Productivity Applications (slides)
Emine Yilmaz, Professor at University College London Incorporating User State in Task Based Information Retrieval and Recommendation of Educational Resources (slides)

Call for papers

SUM’20 Workshop is an event co-located within the WSDM conference on February 7th, 2020, in Houston, TX (USA).

A full-day workshop is organized for experts in Artificial Intelligence, Web Search and Data Mining to come together to address the timely topic of state-based user modelling.

The expected outcome of the workshop is to facilitate a forum for leveraging intelligent methods for modelling user's state and its transition in an effective manner. We welcome three categories of papers:

  • Research papers present novel methods and use cases of leveraging state-based user modelling. They may present experimental breakthroughs and exemplary application of user state modelling and personalisation. 
  • On-going work may cover any aspect of the development of new AI tools and methodologies related to modelling user state. In this case the project or action may not be finished, and, especially in those cases where the expected impact is long-term, the evaluation may be incomplete.
  • Position/Vision papers may concern untouched challenges or the use of technologies which up to now have not been tested on the ground.

We welcome technical contributions and position papers from a wide range of topics, including but not limited to:

  • User representation and recommender systems
  • Task understanding and supporting user tasks
  • State-aware evaluation
  • Human in the loop
  • User-aware systems
  • Cognitive/contextual user understanding
  • State-aware ML algorithms

Papers will appear in a workshop proceedings, which will be made publicly available online at the workshop website for no charge. Accepted papers will have a presentation (oral and/or poster) at the workshop. Papers must be submitted in PDF according to the new two-column ACM format published in the ACM guidelines, selecting the generic "sigconf" sample. Papers should be no more than six pages in length, including diagrams, appendices and references. SUM’20 submissions should be double-blind. 

All papers should be a maximum 6 pages in length. Position papers can be shorter (2 pages). In all cases, one additional page of cited references is allowed. All submissions and reviews will be handled electronically. Papers must be submitted through Easychair by 23:59, AoE (Anywhere on Earth) on December 1st, 2019.

For inquires about the workshop and submissions, please email to info@k4all.org 

Mounia Lalmas, Director of Research and Head of Research in Personalization, Spotify

Abstract

User engagement plays a central role in companies and organisations operating online services. A main challenge is to leverage knowledge about the online interaction of users to understand what engage them short-term and more importantly long-term. Two critical steps of improving user engagement are defining the right metrics and properly optimising for them. A common way that engagement is measured and understood is through the definition and development of metrics of user satisfaction, which can act as proxy of short-term user engagement, mostly at session level. In the context of recommender systems, developing a better understanding of how users interact (implicit signals) with them during their online session is important for developing metrics of user satisfaction. Detecting and understanding implicit signals of user satisfaction are essential for enhancing the quality of the recommendations. This talk will present various works and personal thoughts on how to develop metrics of user engagement, which recommender systems can optimize for. An important message was that, for recommender systems to work both in the short and the long-term, it is important to consider the heterogeneity of both user and content to formalise the notion of engagement, and in turn design the appropriate metrics to capture these and optimize for. One way to achieve this is to follow these four steps: 1) Understanding intents; 2) Optimizing for the right metric; 3) Acting on segmentation; and 4) Thinking about diversity.

Speaker bio

Mounia Lalmas is a Director of Research at Spotify, and the Head of Tech Research in Personalization. Before that, she was a Director of Research at Yahoo, where she led a team of researchers working on advertising quality for Gemini, Yahoo native advertising platform. She also worked with various teams at Yahoo on topics related to user engagement in the context of news, search, and user generated content. Prior to this, she held a Microsoft Research/RAEng Research Chair at the School of Computing Science, University of Glasgow. Before that, she was Professor of Information Retrieval at the Department of Computer Science at Queen Mary, University of London. Her work focuses on studying user engagement in areas such as native advertising, digital media, social media, search, and now audio. She has given numerous talks and tutorials on these and related topics, including recently a WWW 2019 tutorial on "Online User Engagement: Metrics and Optimization". She is regularly a senior programme committee member at conferences such as WSDM, KDD, WWW and SIGIR. She was co-programme chair for SIGIR 2015, WWW 2018 and WSDM 2020.

Eugene Agichtein, Winship Associate Professor, Emory University, USA
Eugene Agichtein, Winship Associate Professor, Emory University, USA

Abstract

As spoken conversational assistants operate in increasingly complex domains, predicting user satisfaction in conversational systems has become critical. In particular, online satisfaction prediction (i.e., predicting satisfaction of the user with the system after each turn) could be used as a new proxy for implicit user feedback, and offers promising opportunities to create more responsive and effective conversational agents, which adapt to the user’s engagement with the agent. Measuring immediate changes in user satisfaction also enables for natural user studies without explicit disruptions to user experience. I will discuss our progress on conversational satisfaction modeling, and applications to automatically evaluating the effects new agent features, e.g., conversation topic suggestion, design choices, e.g., new recommendation phrasing, and subtle VUI features, e.g., prosody modulation for agent responses.

Speaker bio

Dr. Eugene Agichtein is a Winship Associate Professor of Computer Science at Emory University in Atlanta, USA, where he leads the Intelligent Information Access Laboratory (IR Lab). Since January 2019, he has been an "Amazon Scholar” at Amazon Alexa. Eugene's research spans the areas of information retrieval, natural language processing, data mining, and human computer interaction, most recently focusing on conversational search and recommendation. Together with colleagues and students, Eugene published over 100 papers, and has been recognized by multiple awards, including A.P. Sloan Fellow and the 2013 Karen Spark Jones Award from the British Computer Society, and "test of time" and best paper awards from the SIGIR and WSDM conference. He was Program Co-Chair of the WSDM 2012 and WWW 2017 conferences. Website: http://www.cs.emory.edu/~eugene/.

Ahmed Awadallah, Principal Research Manager, Microsoft Research

Abstract

Information workers spend significant amounts of their time managing personal information such as communications, documents and tasks. A recent study reported that the average information worker spends an estimated 28 percent of the workweek managing e-mail and nearly 20 percent looking for internal information or tracking down colleagues who can help with specific tasks. This highlights the potential value intelligent technologies could provide by realizing faster and more effective collaboration and information sharing. The use of artificial intelligence in online services has been steadily increasing. Over the past couple of years, we have worked on techniques for understanding user interaction in communication, information sharing and task management to create new intelligence experiences that can help us be more productive. In this talk, I will present an overview of this line of research.

Speaker bio

Ahmed Awadallah is a Principal Research Manager at Microsoft Research AI. He leads the Language & Information Technologies team which focuses on enabling machines to understand and communicate in natural language, answer complex questions, assist with task completion and understand how people interact with information.  Before joining Microsoft Research, Ahmed received his Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Michigan Ann Arbor and spent some time working at IBM studying a variety of natural language processing problems. Ahmed published 80+ peer-reviewed and is an  inventor on 25 (granted and pending) patents. His past research focused on understanding, measuring and improving  Web search systems. More recently his research focuses on creating scalable machine learning models for NLP and building natural language interfaces to services and data. More details can be found at: https://aka.ms/ahmed

Emine Yilmaz, Turing Fellow and Professor at University College London
Emine Yilmaz, Turing Fellow and Professor at University College London

Abstract

Accurate representation of user state plays a critical role in understanding user needs and providing them with accurate information at the correct time. In this talk, I will talk about two applications in which incorporating user state could be highly important: task based information retrieval and recommendation of educational resources. In the first part of the talk, I will describe the work we have done on incorporating representations of user state to task based search engines and show how one can use these representations to predict user needs. I will then move on to recommendation of educational resources, describe a way of representing user state (skills) and describe methods that can be used to match learners with educational resources based on their skill level.

Speaker bio

Emine Yilmaz is a Turing Fellow and Professor at University College London (UCL), Department of Computer Science, as well as an Amazon Scholar at Amazon. Between 2012 and 2019, she also worked as a research consultant for Microsoft Research Cambridge, where she used to work full as a researcher prior to joining UCL. Emine's current research interests include information retrieval, data mining and applications of machine learning. Her research until now has received several awards including a Bloomberg Data Science Research Award in 2018, the Karen Sparck Jones Award in 2015 and the Google Faculty Research Award in 2014. She has published research papers extensively at major venues such as ACM SIGIR, CIKM and WSDM, gave several tutorials as part of top conferences, and organized various workshops. She has served in various roles including co-editor-in-chief for the Information Retrieval Journal, PC Chair for ECIR 2020, ACM SIGIR 2018 and ACM ICTIR 2017 Conferences, Practice and Experience Chair for ACM WSDM 2017, and as the Doctoral Consortium Chair for ECIR 2017. She is also one of the recipients of the prestigious EPSRC Fellowship.

We would like to improve the subsequent workshops on State-based User Modelling.

Please give us your feedback here

Keep in touch

If you would like to receive more information and get involved in organizing the subsequent SUM workshops.

Please submit your email address here

This workshop is designed to create a research roadmap for Human-centered Artificial Intelligence. It also aims at creating input for policy leaders, both within and outside of the civil service. This series is supported through the 37 partners within the partnership of the HumanAI project.

Join us @ IJCAI 2019 on August 11th

Register here 

08:30 Welcome and setting the stage
  • Colin de la Higuera, Université de Nantes, UNESCO Chair in teacher training technologies with OER
08:45‑09:30 Invited talk: Artificial Intelligence for Development (AI4D) programme or how can a Global South Network of AI researchers be built and what are the benefits?
  • Phet Sayo, Senior Program Officer at Canada's International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
  • Kathleen Siminyu, lead for AI4D African Network
09:00‑10:00 Session 1: Life and Society
10:00‑10:30 Coffee Break
10:30‑12:00 Session 2: Understanding our Planet from images
12:30‑14:00 Lunch break
14:00-14:45 Invited research talk: X5GON – a project on Artificial Intelligence and Open Educational Resources

This talk fits SDG 4: Quality Education.

  • Erik Novak, Jozef Stefan Institute, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, member of the UNESCO Chair on Open Technologies for OER and Open Learning
14:45-15:30 UNESCO Debate: AI and the Information Sphere: Solutions for SDGs Questions of Rights, Access, Openness and Multistakeholderism
  • Moderator: Davor Orlic, Knowledge 4 All Foundation
  • Zeynep Varoglu, Programme Specialist, ICT in Education Knowledge Societies Division Communication and Information Sector UNESCO
  • Prateek Sibal, Consultant UNESCO, co-author of the upcoming UNESCO publication "Steering AI for Knowledge Societies"
  • Maria Fasli, University of Essex, UNESCO Chair in Data Science and Analytics
15:30-16:00 Coffee break
16:00‑18:00 Session 3: Education

Session 4: Setting targets and measuring impact

18:00 Wrap-up and final words

Meet the speakers

Vukosi Marivate, University of Pretoria, CSIR, Deep Learning Indaba
Vukosi Marivate, University of Pretoria, CSIR, Deep Learning Indaba

Chelsea Chen is the co-founder of Emotech Ltd.
Chelsea Chen is the co-founder of Emotech Ltd.

Kathleen Siminyu, Africa's Talking, Deep Learning Indaba
Kathleen Siminyu, Africa's Talking, Deep Learning Indaba

Moses Thiga, Kabarak University
Moses Thiga, Kabarak University

Maria Fasli, University of Essex, UNESCO Chair in Data Science and Analytics
Maria Fasli, University of Essex, UNESCO Chair in Data Science and Analytics

Sahan Bulathwela, Computational Statistics and Machine Learning at University College London
Sahan Bulathwela, Computational Statistics and Machine Learning at University College London

Zeynep Varoglu, Programme Specialist, ICT in Education, Knowledge Societies Division, Communication and Information Sector, UNESCO
Zeynep Varoglu, Programme Specialist, ICT in Education, Knowledge Societies Division, Communication and Information Sector, UNESCO

Dhananjay Nahata, Deep Learning at BITS Pilani, India
Dhananjay Nahata, Deep Learning at BITS Pilani, India

Phet Sayo, Senior Program Officer at International Development Research Centre
Phet Sayo, Senior Program Officer at International Development Research Centre

Vishal Bhalla, CS graduate from the Technical University of Munich
Vishal Bhalla, CS graduate from the Technical University of Munich

Davor Orlic, Knowledge 4 All Foundation
Davor Orlic, Knowledge 4 All Foundation

Colin de la Higuera, Nantes University, UNESCO Chair in teacher training technologies with OER
Colin de la Higuera, Nantes University, UNESCO Chair in teacher training technologies with OER

Slava Jankin, Data Science and Public Policy, Hertie School of Governance
Slava Jankin, Data Science and Public Policy, Hertie School of Governance

Donghyun Ahn, MS Candidate student from KAIST, School of computing
Donghyun Ahn, MS Candidate student from KAIST, School of computing

Ardie Orden, GIS Analyst, Thinking Machines Data Science
Ardie Orden, GIS Analyst, Thinking Machines Data Science

Erik Novak researcher at the Jožef Stefan Institute
Erik Novak researcher at the Jožef Stefan Institute

 

Workshop motivation

The motivation supporting this workshop is that contributing to the SDGs through AI could represent a win-win approach in which not only the goals themselves receive due attention but moreover this attention will be shared and integrated and allow a fruitful North-South cooperation.

The workshop will provide a forum for the presentation and discussion of analyses of projects, initiatives and existing research networks with emphasis on identifying a portfolio of AI projects addressing SDGs. Particular interest will be placed on presentations that consider alternative ways of using AI for SDGs where it can be argued that they will aim towards creating communities around the SDG themes and thus introduce the sustainability and scalability of AI research networks. The workshop will focus on understanding how and when AI is successful in addressing the different SDG challenges and will aim at providing opportunities to integrate more research expertise –and more diverse research expertise in these tasks.

We also hope to assess and deepen our understanding of AI capacity and use in the North-South relationship with the aim of developing a capacity building agenda. An overall medium term objective is to establish a Global Network of Excellence in AI cross-cutting all regions of the world to address and contribute to sustainable development through the responsible and inclusive design and deployment of AI for SDGs. The goal of such a global network will be to engrain the principles of the SDGs into the awareness of AI researchers.

Building a Global Network of AI researchers

A recent common effort by ICDE, UNESCO and Knowledge 4 All Foundation (K4A) including the newly established UNESCO Chair in AI was a mapping of AI talents, actors, and knowledge hot spots in the Global south, which illustrates the extent to which universities, start-ups, and other sectors already engage with AI in 4 regions: ASIA, LAC, MENA, and SSA. The results show a surprising number of 600 entities from 33 countries.

This resulted in the decision of launching the Network of Research Excellence in Artificial Intelligence in Africa with the purpose of providing a better understanding of the current state of capacities across Sub-Saharan Africa to engage in AI for development. The idea now is to expand, scale and sustain a Global Network of Excellence, and mobilize it towards addressing all SDGs.

To this end, we are investing and design a range of AI for development initiatives, focusing on innovations, foundations and governance. These initiatives will support relevant research, develop AI applications that are inclusive, ethical, and rights-based, and strengthen and create appropriate capacity building programs.

Global sustainability agenda

In 2015 the United Nations General Assembly approved the important document prepared by UNESCO in which it defined 17 goals for the 21st century. These Sustainable Development Goals or SDGs address what should be considered as the most important issues for humanity and society. They are used today as a roadmap by many institutions and, in particular, by the UNESCO Chairs over the world who have the task of promoting these questions and contributing from the perspective of education and research.

AI and Sustainabiltiy

Recent developments in AI have managed to attract the attention of stakeholders beyond the research communities and industries. Policymakers in international IGOs, NGOs such as UNESCO, OECD, European Commission and a number of UN Member State governments have embraced the idea of AI with a great deal of furore as well as skepticism. All these players are setting up working groups in order to understand better the implications of AI on a larger scale and its positive and negative implications to their own nations and global citizens.

It is therefore understandable that SDGs and AI should meet: as data is being produced and solutions are being shared, quite unsurprisingly academia and industry have been taking up the challenge of meeting the SDGs with artificial intelligence driven solutions.

Inequalities and AI divide

Yet a great key challenge that could deepen inequalities across the globe is the so-called AI divide. The clear majority of AI experts are in North America, Europe and Asia. Other regions and sub-regions are much less represented among the expertise pool, and though there are many new AI-related initiatives emerging around continents, this expertise remains essentially unseen by Northern technology hubs.

Such lack of diversity can entrench unintended algorithmic biases and build discrimination into AI products and result in a deficit of educated practitioners. And these are not the only gaps: for example in the case of Africa, fewer African AI researchers and engineers means fewer opportunities to use AI to improve the lives of Africans.

Knowledge 4 All Foundation and UNESCO Chairs are organizing a 1-day workshop of experts in Artificial Intelligence addressing scalable solutions or exemplars for SDGs with an emphasis on creating potential sub-networks of researchers around each of the 17 SDGs.

The result of the workshop will be to build the global ML/AI landscape for SDGs, understand the scope of a potential Network of Excellence in AI across all regions and provide inputs for an AI roadmap for SDGs, including designing a viable plan for cross-continent cooperation.

We solicit three categories of papers: research papers, on-going work papers, and position/vision papers.

  • Research papers present use cases of AI for the SDGs. They may present platforms or systems or in-the-field projects; they may require the development of novel AI tools.
  • On-going work may cover any aspect of the development of new AI tools and methodologies to address SDGs. In this case the project or action may not be terminated, and, especially in those cases where the expected impact is long-term, the evaluation may be incomplete.
  • Position/Vision papers may concern untouched challenges or the use of technologies which up to now have not been tested on the ground.

Topics should address (at least some of) the UN Sustainable Development Goals:

  • Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere
  • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
  • Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
  • Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and quality education for all and promote lifelong learning
  • Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
  • Goal 6: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all
  • Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
  • Goal 8: Promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment and decent work for all
  • Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
  • Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries
  • Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
  • Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
  • Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
  • Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources
  • Goal 15: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss
  • Goal 16: Promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies
  • Goal 17: Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

All papers should be a maximum 6 pages in length. Position papers can be shorter (2 pages). One additional page of cited references is allowed. You may also attach full papers of any format or length that supplement your submission, but we do not guarantee to take these into account in the reviewing process. You may submit work that has previously been published — but please give details of how it has previously been published. Our review process will not be blind: please submit your contributions as PDFs containing the authors’ names.

In order to encourage submissions from as many regions as possible conditional submissions are possible: the authors may send in their contribution even if the financial backing necessary to attend the conference is not yet secured. The organizers will attempt to help find sponsors.

Submission is via Easychair here.

We intend to make accepted contributions available online, linked to the workshop page. There will be no formal published proceedings.

Important dates

Apr 26, 2019: deadline for submission of contributions to workshops
May 10, 2019: paper acceptance notification
Aug 10-12, 2019: IJCAI-2019 Workshops

Any enquiries should be sent to info@k4all.org email address.

Programme Committee

  • Colin de la Higuera, Université de Nantes, UNESCO Chair in teacher training technologies with OER
  • Davor Orlic, COO, Knowledge 4 All Foundation
  • Vukosi Marivate, University of Pretoria, ABSA UP Chair of Data Science, Deep Learning Indaba community
  • Kathleen Siminyu, Africa's Talking, Deep Learning Indaba community
  • Mitja Jermol, Jozef Stefan Institute, UNESCO Chair on Open Technologies for OER and Open Learning
  • Maria Fasli, University of Essex, UNESCO Chair in Analytics and Data Science
  • John Shawe-Taylor, University College London, UNESCO Chair in Artificial Intelligence
  • Marko Grobelnik, Jozef Stefan Institute, Digital Champion Republic of Slovenia
  • James Hodson, CEO, AI for Good Foundation, Senior Researcher, Jozef Stefan Institute Artificial Intelligence Lab
  • Emine Yilmaz, University College London
  • Marcelino Caberera Giraldez, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC-Seville)

Description

This workshop is part of a global AI4D initiative, which we expect will help shape the use of AI in the global south, mainly through strengthening regional networks and advancing global thematic initiatives (please see IDRC’s white paper for more information about the AI4D).

The workshop will bring together machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML/AI) practitioners from research communities across Africa and the world to collaboratively design activities that will strengthen the work of African AI4D of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners.

In collaboration with African researchers and other key stakeholders, we expect to co-design a program of activities that will foster the spread of AI applications for social good, while supporting the development of solutions and capacities that ensure AI applications are inclusive, open, and rights-based.

The intention of the workshop is to:

  • Scope out the African ML/AI landscape
  • Provide inputs for an African AI research and capacity building roadmap, and
  • Support the development of cross-continent cooperation on AI for sustainable development.

It is anticipated that the outcome of the workshop will be a Network of Excellence on AI for sub Saharan African researchers who focus on applications, research and capacity building relating to AI and human development.

Organizing Committee

  • John Shawe-Taylor, UNESCO Chair in Artificial Intelligence, Director K4A, Head of Computer Science Dept. University College London
  • Davor Orlic, COO, Knowledge 4 All Foundation
  • Fernando Perini, Senior Program Officer, International Development Research Centre
  • Ruhiya Seward, Senior Program Officer, International Development Research Centre
  • Kathleen Siminyu, Head of Data Science, Africa's Talking
  • Isaac M Rutenberg, Strathmore Law School, Strathmore University
  • Robert Muthuri, Strathmore Law School, Strathmore University
  • Bhanu Neupane, Programme Specialist, Knowledge Societies Division, CI Sector UNESCO

The kick-off meeting will cover the following:

  • Review of project overview and different roles and potential outcomes
  • Definition of different structures and where possible identification of individual responsibilities
  • Presentation of available software and networks that can be exploited
  • Identification of areas where development is needed and which partners will be responsible for what
  • Scheduling of next set of meetings, including a technical workshop later in the year probably also in Slovenia, PMC meetings, and next project meetings.

NIPS 2017: Saturday December 9th 09:00 – 16:30

Democracy of information

Social Media and other online media sources play a critical role in distributing news and informing public opinion. Initially it seemed that democratising the dissemination of information and news with online media might be wholly good – but during the last year we have witnessed other perhaps less positive effects.

Reality of Echo chambers

The algorithms that prioritise content for users aim to provide information that will be ‘liked’ by each user in order to retain their attention and interest. These algorithms are now well-tuned and are indeed able to match content to different users’ preferences. This has meant that users increasingly see content that aligns with their world view, confirms their beliefs, supports their opinions, in short that maintains their ‘information bubble’, creating the so-called echo-chambers. As a result, views have often become more polarised rather than less, with people expressing genuine disbelief that fellow citizens could possibly countenance alternative opinions, be they pro- or anti-brexit, pro- or anti-Trump. Perhaps the most extreme example is that of fake news in which news is created in order to satisfy and reinforce certain beliefs.

Results of Polarised opinions

This polarisation of views cannot be beneficial for society. As the success of Computer Science and more specifically Machine Learning have led to this undesirable situation, it is natural that we should now ask how Online Content might be prioritised in such a way that users are still satisfied with an outlet but at the same time are not led to more extreme and polarised opinions.

What is the effect of content prioritisation – and more generally, the effect of the affordances of the social network – on the nature of discussion and debate? Social networks could potentially enable society-wide debate and collective intelligence. On the other hand, they could also encourage communal reinforcement by enforcing conformity within friendship groups, in that it is a daring person who posts an opinion at odds with the majority of their friends. Each design of content prioritisation may nudge users towards particular styles of both content-viewing and of content-posting and discussion. What is the nature of the interaction between content-presentation and users’ viewing and debate?

Transparency of Content

Content may be prioritised either ‘transparently’ according to users’ explicit choices of what they want to see, combined with transparent community voting, and moderators whose decisions can be questioned (e.g. Reddit). At the other extreme, content may be prioritised by proprietary algorithms that model each user’s preferences and then predict what they want to see. What is the range of possible designs and what are their effects? Could one design intelligent power-tools for moderators?

The online portal Reddit is a rare exception to the general rule in that it has proven a popular site despite employing a more nuanced algorithm for the prioritisation of content. The approach was, however, apparently designed to manage traffic flows rather than create a better balance of opinions. It would, therefore, appear that even for this algorithm its effect on prioritisation is only partially understood or intended.

Redesigning alghoritms

If we view social networks as implementing a large scale message-passing algorithm attempting to perform inference about the state of the world and possible interventions and/or improvements, the current prioritisation algorithms create many (typically short) cycles. It is well known that inference based on message passing fails to converge to an optimal solution if the underlying graph contains cycles because information then becomes incorrectly weighted. Perhaps a similar situation is occurring with the use of social media? Is it possible to model this phenomenon as an approximate inference task?

The workshop

The workshop will provide a forum for the presentation and discussion of analyses of online prioritisation with emphasis on the biases that such prioritisations introduce and reinforce. Particular interest will be placed on presentations that consider alternative ways of prioritising content where it can be argued that they will reduce the negative side-effects of current methods while maintaining user loyalty.

Invited Speakers:

The following speakers have confirmed their attendance at the workshop:

  • Aristides Gionis, University of Aalto
  • Delip Rao, Joostware AI Research and Johns Hopkins University
  • Suresh Venkatasubramanian, University of Utah
  • Andreas Vlachos, University of Sheffield

Organising Committee:

  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, University of Milan
  • Marko Grobelnik, Jozef Stefan Institute
  • Massimiliano Pontil, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia and University College London
  • Sebastian Riedel, University College London
  • Davor Orlic, Knowledge 4 All Foundation
  • John Shawe-Taylor, University College London
  • Chris Watkins, Royal Holloway
  • Emine Yilmaz, University College London

Sponsors

09:00‑10:00 Invited talk : Automating textual claim verification
Andreas Vlachos, University of Sheffield
10:30‑11:10 Presenations:
11:30‑11:50 Spotlights:
11:55-12:10 Poster session:
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, University of Milan
12:10-13:00 Lunch break
13:00-14:00 Debate: Philosophy and ethics of defining, identifying, and tackling fake news and inappropriate content
Moderator: Chris Watkins, University College London
14:00‑15:00 Invited talk: Political echo chambers in social media
Aris Gionis, Aalto University
15:00‑15:30 Coffee break
15:30‑16:30 Debate: Reality around fake news
Moderator: Chris Watkins, University College London

Abstracts due October 23rd;  acceptances sent November 7th

Within the past few years, social media have become dominant aggregators and distributors of news. Much public discussion has moved online to social media such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and comment boards. Traditional newspapers and news channels have lost influence to new online forums with weaker editorial controls.

Perhaps as a result, fake news and lies spread fast and widely. Online political discussion is polarised and tribal. Echo-chambers reinforce one-sided views without presenting any balancing alternatives. False rumours persist even when disproved.

One original promise of the Internet was that it would empower better democratic discussion, with wider participation, and better universal access to true news and argument.  If this has not happened, what technologies can we build to achieve it?

Best Paper Award prize is $1,000 USD

We invite contributions on any of these or related topics:

Fake news and fact checking:

  • Tracing widely distributed content back to its origins
  • Enhancing content in real time with fact checking
  • Proactive identification of news trends
  • Monitoring, detection, and moderation of polarizing topics

Presenting and organising content:

  • Defining ‘fair discussion’ and algorithmic fairness
  • Voting and reputation systems for collective evaluation and prioritisation
  • Identifying and mitigating tribalism and echo chambers
  • Algorithmic fairness in news retrieval and presentation

Abuse, hate speech, and illegal content:

  • Identifying abuse and breaches of rules for civil discussion
  • Detecting and mitigating tribalism
  • New tools for moderators

Collective intelligence:

  • How can the quality of on-line discussion be evaluated?
  • Improved technologies for online discussion that enable better collective intelligence
  • Models of online discussion as large-scale message passing analogous to graphical models

Please send an abstract of up to two pages summarising your contribution; one additional page of cited references is allowed. You may also attach full papers of any format or length that supplement your submission, but we do not guarantee to take these into account in the reviewing process. You may submit work that has previously been published — but please give details of how it has previously been published. Our review process will not be blind: please submit your contributions as PDFs containing the authors’ names.

We intend to make accepted contributions available online, linked to the workshop page. There will be no formal published proceedings.

Important Information

  • Submission deadline: October 23th
  • Submissions are closed
  • Acceptance decisions sent: November 7th
  • Date of Workshop: December 9th 2017

Any enquiries should be sent to info@k4all.org email address

The kick-off meeting will cover the following:

  • Formal presentation by the project officer (probably via skype)
  • Review of project overview and different roles and potential outcomes
  • Definition of different structures and where possible identification of individual responsibilities
  • Presentation of available software and networks that can be exploited
  • Identification of areas where development is needed and which partners will be responsible for what
  • Scheduling of next set of meetings, including a technical workshop later in the year (perhaps w/c 20/11) probably also in Slovenia, PMC meetings, and next project meetings.

The kick-off is in line with two other events co-organised by K4A:

Agenda

Day 1 – Wednesday 20.9
09:00 – 11:00
  • Welcome and Introductions
  • Project overview and presentation of management WP (WP9)
11:00 –  11:30 Coffee Break
11:30 – 13:00
  • Connection to Project Officer
  • Discussion
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch
14:00 – 16:00
  • Presentations of technology WPs (WP1 – WP4)
  • Discussion
16:00 – 16:30 Coffee Break
16:30 – 18:00
  • Presentations of pilots and interfaces WPs (WP5 – WP6)
  • Discussion
21:00 – 22:30 Dinner at Restaurant Most
Day 2 – Thursday 21.9
09:00 – 11:00
  • Presentations of business and outreach (WP7 – WP8)
  • Presentation on data influencing policies (WP8)
  • Discussion
11:00 –  11:30 Coffee Brake
11:30 – 13:00
  • Wrapping up and Closure
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch

Photo gallery

Organized by
Knowledge 4 All Foundation

Sponsored by

Social Media and other online media sources play a critical role in distributing news and informing public opinion. At first it seemed that democratising the dissemination of information and news with online media might be wholly good – but during the last year we have witnessed other perhaps less positive effects.

The algorithms that prioritise content for users aim to provide information that will be ‘liked’ by each user in order to retain their attention and interest. These algorithms are now well-tuned and are indeed able to match content to different users’ preferences. This has meant that users increasingly see content that aligns with their world view, confirms their beliefs, supports their opinions, in short that maintains their ‘information bubble’. As a result, views have often become more polarised rather than less, with people expressing genuine disbelief that fellow citizens could possibly countenance alternative opinions, be they pro- or anti-brexit, pro- or anti-Trump.

This polarisation of views cannot be beneficial for society. As the success of Computer Science and more specifically Machine Learning have led to this undesirable situation, it is natural that we should now ask how Online Content might be prioritised in such a way that users are still satisfied with an outlet but at the same time are not led to more extreme and polarised opinions.

What is the effect of content prioritisation – and more generally, the effect of the affordances of the social network – on the nature of discussion and debate?  Social networks could potentially enable society-wide debate and collective intelligence. On the other hand, they could also enforce conformity within friendship groups, in that it is a daring person who posts an opinion at odds with the majority of their friends. Each design of content prioritisation may nudge users towards particular styles of both content-viewing and of content-posting and discussion. What is the nature of the interaction between content-presentation and users’ viewing and debate?

Content may be prioritised either ‘transparently’ according to users’ explicit choices of what they want to see, combined with transparent community voting, and moderators whose decisions can be questioned (e.g. Reddit). At the other extreme, content may be prioritised by proprietary algorithms that model each user’s preferences and then predict what they want to see. What is the range of possible designs and what are their effects? Could one design intelligent power-tools for moderators?

The online portal Reddit is a rare exception to the general rule in that it has proven a popular site despite employing a more nuanced algorithm for the prioritisation of content. The approach was, however, apparently designed to manage traffic flows rather than create a better balance of opinions. It would, therefore, appear that even for this algorithm its effect on prioritisation is only partially understood or intended.

If we view social networks as implementing a large scale message-passing algorithm attempting to perform inference about the state of the world and possible interventions and/or improvements, the current prioritisation algorithms create many (typically short) cycles. It is well known that inference based on message passing fails to converge to an optimal solution if the underlying graph contains cycles because information then becomes incorrectly weighted. Perhaps a similar situation is occurring with the use of social media?

The workshop will provide a forum for the presentation and discussion of analyses of online prioritisation with emphasis on the biases that such prioritisations introduce and reinforce. Particular interest will be placed on presentations that consider alternative ways of prioritising content where it can be argued that they will reduce the negative side-effects of current methods while maintaining user loyalty.

Contributions

Either theoretical or practical - are welcomed in relevant areas including but not limited to the following directions:

Analysis of media:

  • Detection and prediction of emerging trends;
  • Detection of tribalism among online personas;
  • Detection of trolling, abuse, and fake news;
  • Intelligent tools for discussion moderators

Enhancement of content:

  • Automatic fact-checking;
  • Annotation according to viewpoint;
  • Visualisation and navigation of large on-line discussions

Enhancement of discussion:

  • Adapting improved message-passing algorithms for social media;
  • Gamification architectures and their effects on discussion;
  • Mitigation of tribalism

Algorithmic fairness:

  • What does it mean for an algorithm to be ‘fair’ in content prioritization?
  • Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, Università degli Studi di Milano
  • Massimiliano Pontil, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia and University College, London
  • John Shawe-Taylor, University College, London
  • Chris Watkins, Royal Holloway, London
  • Emine Yilmaz, University College, London
10:00‑10:30 Welcome

John Shawe Taylor, Director of K4A and Head of Computer Science Dept. University College London

10:30‑11:15 Auditing Search Engines for Differential Satisfaction Across Demographics + discussion
Rishabh Mehrotra, University College London
11:15‑11:45 Fake News Challenge + discussion
Sebastian Riedel, University College London
11:45‑12:30 Reddit and its medical uses + discussion
Chris Watkins, University College London
12:30 Lunch
Reddit and its medical uses + discussion
Chris Watkins, University College London
13:00‑13:45 Machine Learning problems related to Global Media Monitoring
Marko Grobelnik, Jozef Stefan Institute
13:45‑14:00 Report on actions taken by companies in response to fake news issue
Davor Orlic, Knowledge 4 All
14:00‑15:00 How to improve comment boards with curated discussion
Chris Watkins, University College London
15:00‑16:30 Discussion of workshop proposal and next steps
  • Chris Watkins, Royal Holloway, London
  • Emine Yilmaz, University College, London
  • Sebastian Riedel, University College, London
  • Andreas Vlachos, University of Sheffield
  • Marko Grobelnik, Jozef Stefan Institute

The 2nd International Workshop on "Learning, Agents and Formal Languages" (LAFLang) will be held in February 2013, in Barcelona, Spain. It will be co-located with ICAART 2013 (5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence).

The workshop focuses on the common space delimited by three main areas: machine learning, agent technologies and formal language theory. The main goal of the workshop is to promote interdisciplinarity among people working in such disciplines,
boosting the interchange of knowledge and viewpoints between specialists.

We are interested in contributions on any interaction between machine learning, agent technologies and formal language theory. Topics include (but are not limited to):

- Agent systems modelling
- Computational models of language learning
- Theoretical and/or empirical aspects of Grammatical Inference
- Theoretical descriptions of languages based on agent systems
- Formal models of bio-inspired agent systems
- Learning agents: Machine learning and Agent systems
- Applications of machine learning and agent technologies to natural language processing, human-computer interaction and language evolution.
- Intelligent human-computer interaction

2nd International Workshop on Learning, Agents and Formal Languages
2nd International Workshop on Learning, Agents and Formal Languages

Leonor Becerra-Bonache Leonor Becerra-Bonache
M. Dolores Jiménez-López Rovira i Virigli Univeristy, Tarragona, Spain

Philippe Beaune, ENS Mines Saint-Etienne, France
Leonor Becerra-Bonache, University of Saint-Etienne, France
Olivier Boissier, ENS Mines Saint-Etienne, France
Alexander Clark, Royal Holloway University of London, UK
Colin de la Higuera, Nantes University, France
Ricard Gavaldà, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain
Amaury Habrard, University of Saint-Etienne, France
Jeffrey Heinz, University of Delaware, USA
Adrian Horia Dediu, “Politehnica” University of Bucharest, Romania
Jean Christophe Janodet, University of Evry, France
María Dolores Jiménez-López, Rovira i Virgili University, Spain
José Oncina, University of Alicante, Spain
Alfonso Ortega, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
Marc Sebban, University of Saint-Etienne, France
Menno van Zaanen, Tilburg University, Netherlands
György Vaszil,University of Debrecen, Hungary

Optimization lies at the heart of many machine learning algorithms and enjoys great interest in our community. Indeed, this intimate relation of optimization with ML is the key motivation for the OPT series of workshops. We aim to foster discussion, discovery, and dissemination of the state-of-the-art in optimization relevant to ML.